Updated 4 November 2026 Awwwards ● The FWA ● CSS Design Awards

Exhibita

A journal of the best-designed websites

The short version

Out: many colours at once.In: a real footer.

many colours at once fell from 28% to 19% of award winners in a year, while a real footer went from 6% to 12%.

01 — The short answer

What's hot

Five countdowns: what the winners look like, the colours they use, what moves, how people are got around, and what is climbing fastest. Every row shows a winner carrying it, and says whether it is rising or falling.

02 — Which way this is heading

In & Out

Down: giant headlines, 25% to 15%. Up: a guided sequence, 22% to 29%. Every movement in the record, counted two independent ways, with the ones both counts agree on marked.

03 — What they have in common

Trends

The whole record read at once: which traits cluster, which have moved, and what separates one kind of site from another.

04 — One list, eight ways

Wire

Today's arrivals drawn eight different ways — marquee, poster, mosaic, terminal, contact sheet — and what each arrangement does to the same material.

05 — Browse by kind of business

Categories

Shops, museums, restaurants, studios — 20 kinds of site, because a bakery and a bank are not the same brief and should not arrive at the same page.

06 — Browse by decision

Craft

Colour, structure and motion — the three decisions every project makes, and what each one signals about the kind of site you are making.

07 — Showing your own work

Portfolios

A portfolio that wins is built out of pages, not spectacle — a real project page and a real about page beat every effect client work reaches for. Six ways of putting the work in front of someone.

08 — The first screen

Landings

The landing pages the galleries are showing this week, and what a winning first screen ships before any JavaScript runs.

09 — What the first screen says

Words

The headlines off 312 winners' own home pages, word for word. 78% of them address nobody — no you, no we — which is the opposite of every instruction ever given about writing for the web.

10 — The screen it is really seen on

Phone

What phone-first work does differently — the order of things rather than the look of them — and which kinds of site fall apart when the wide composition goes.

11 — Ranked by the jury

Top rated

Every recent winner in the order the jury scored it, this week's arrivals, and the live board from five award sources.

12 — Every Site of the Year

Canon

The top prize on the web, all of it in one gallery. Scroll to the oldest and you are looking at the flat web of a decade ago.

13 — Who keeps winning

Studios

The all-time table: which studios clear the bar again and again, where they are, and the different strategies behind it.

14 — Sites taken apart

Case files

Winners looked at closely — including the ones that took the top prize with almost none of the technology everyone assumes is required.

15 — How people get around a page

Navigation

Which patterns are rising, which are going, and what a route people have to learn really costs — measured against the jury's own usability marks.

16 — Presenting yourself

Designers

A grid of thumbnails to browse on 22% of designers’ own sites against 6% of studios’, and 3D on 24% against 35% — with real designers explaining their own practice, and a live shelf of personal sites.

17 — What tomorrow looks like

Futurism

Work about AI, space and the synthetic has a shared look — and it is not the dark, glowing one every brief reaches for first.

18 — How the numbers are made

How it's judged

Design 40, usability 30, creativity 20, content 10. Eighteen jurors, the three most extreme scores discarded, and a five-day clock.

19 — What they are built with

Stack

How movement gets choreographed, how depth gets drawn, and why those skills are becoming teachable rather than rare.

20 — The work ahead

Careers

Which design jobs are growing, which are shrinking, and roughly when.

The story 31 October 2026

The Dropdown Menu, the Last Plain Box on the Page, Can Now Be Designed

For thirty years the menu that drops down when you pick a size, a country or a colour has looked the way the visitor’s computer drew it, whatever the rest of the page looked like. Chrome let designers restyle it last year. Safari followed in September, and on Monday Safari 27.2 added one more piece.

The same menu, two ways

As the visitor’s computer draws it: words only, in the system’s own font

Clay↕
Sand
Clay
Sage
Ink

Restyled: the page’s own type, a colour swatch in each choice

Clay⌄
Sand
Clay✓
Sage
Ink
An illustration. Firefox still shows every visitor the left-hand kind; it is testing the new menu but has not switched it on.

Almost every page that sells something has one: the box you click to choose a size, a country, a delivery day, and the short list that drops out of it. In the trade it is called a select, after the piece of HTML that makes it. Until recently a designer could change little about it beyond the border and the colour of the text. The list that opened was drawn by the visitor’s operating system, in its own font and its own highlight colour, and it could hold only words. Sites that wanted a menu to match the rest of the page built a fake one out of a script and plain boxes, and fake ones often fail people who use a keyboard or a screen reader.

That has changed in two of the three big browsers. Chrome made the menu restylable in version 135, in spring 2025. Safari 27.0 did the same on 17 September. A designer switches it on with one line of CSS, the language that sets how a page looks: appearance: base-select. After that every part can be styled: the box, the list, the little arrow, the tick beside the chosen item. Each choice can now hold more than words, so a paint shop can show a swatch beside each colour and a travel site a flag beside each country. Because it is still the real menu, it keeps working with the keyboard, with screen readers and with forms. Safari’s team put the aim plainly: “a fully custom drop-down menu to match the look and feel of your website”.

Read the full storyClose

The starting look matters too. Switch the new menu on and add nothing, and Safari now draws it with a soft drop shadow, corners rounded by four pixels, rows tall enough for a fingertip, a down-pointing arrow and a tick, in light and dark versions. Safari changed these defaults over the summer and took the design to the CSS Working Group, the body that writes the rules browsers follow, so that every browser can share one starting point.

Safari 27.2, released on Monday, adds a small hook called ::field-content. It lets a designer style the words of the chosen option where they sit in the closed box, without rebuilding the box. The same release keeps a long list from spilling off the edge of the screen.

There is a trade. Chrome’s own announcement lists what the restyled menu gives up: it no longer opens the phone’s built-in picker, and it no longer stretches to fit its longest choice. Firefox has the new menu only behind a hidden setting, so its visitors still see the old one. Nothing breaks for them: a browser that does not know the new line ignores it and draws the ordinary menu.

Why it mattersForms are where a carefully designed page most often turns back into a default one, at the moment someone is choosing what to buy. The menu can now carry the page’s type, colour and pictures. Make the plain version look finished, since Firefox visitors will see it, then restyle the new one, and test it on a phone, where the restyled menu replaces the built-in picker.

Sources: WebKit: Features for Safari 27.2 (26 October 2026) · WebKit: Features for Safari 27.0 (17 September 2026) · Chrome for Developers: The select element can now be customized with CSS (24 March 2025) · MDN: Customizable select elements · MDN browser compatibility data: appearance

A TopSearch Solutions projectHow visits are counted