Updated 10 September 2026 Portfolios
Exhibita A journal of the best-designed websites

Showing your own work

Portfolios

A portfolio that wins is built out of pages, not spectacle. Project page appears on 8% of them against 1% of client work — the widest gap here — while luxury, which client work reaches for constantly, runs at 3% against 8%. The effects go down; the plain pages go up.

The home page of a Paris motion and sound designer, shown as it won.
Pacôme Pertant Portfolio 7.76

The finding

Built Out of Pages, Not Spectacle

What separates a winning portfolio from client work most sharply is not an effect. It is a page for each project and a real page about the person — writing, not design, and the part most portfolios skimp on. It is still a minority who do it: 19% against 4% of client sites. Nothing else in the comparison divides the two so cleanly, and everything client work reaches for to look impressive runs here at half the rate or less.

More than client work

project page 8/1%
about page 13/3%
minimal 17/9%
404 pages 7/5%
gallery 11/8%
typography 24/18%

Less than client work

luxury 3/8%
storytelling 10/24%
sound-audio 4/8%
fullscreen 4/9%
parallax 6/11%
colorful 13/23%

Each row is the share of the 374 portfolios against the share of the 712 client sites; the pale bar is client work, the solid bar is portfolios. Category and tool tags are excluded — film & tv running high says which trades keep a portfolio, not what one should do.

Ways to do it

Six Ways to Present the Work

Ordered by how much more often portfolios reach for each than client work does. The tags behind every count are printed, so nothing here rests on a grouping you cannot check.

The case file

19% of portfolios vs 4% of client work

A page per project, and a page about the person. The work is read rather than browsed.

The strongest signal in the whole comparison, and the least glamorous. Counted from project page, about page.

The quiet index

36% of portfolios vs 24% of client work

Type does the work. Few pictures, wide margins, the list of projects as the interface.

Runs well above client work, where a page this bare would read as unfinished. Counted from minimal, typography.

The gallery

17% of portfolios vs 13% of client work

Everything at once, in a grid you keep pulling.

Still common, but the same shape is falling faster than anything else in client work. Counted from gallery, infinite scroll.

Motion first

70% of portfolios vs 68% of client work

The transitions are the portfolio. What moves between two projects is the sample.

Nearly half of them. The baseline rather than a differentiator. Counted from animation, transitions, microinteractions.

A route you work out

17% of portfolios vs 24% of client work

Navigation as the demonstration. You learn the site, and learning it is the point.

Juries do not dock it — see Navigation — but nothing here says it is safe. Counted from unusual navigation, gestures / interaction, horizontal layout.

The single scroll

22% of portfolios vs 33% of client work

One page, top to bottom, the whole studio in a single movement.

The default for a small body of work; it stops scaling once there are twenty projects. Counted from scrolling, single page, parallax.

On the boards now

Portfolios Landing This Week

Straight off the award and gallery feeds, unfiltered by us beyond looking for the word. 4 right now.

Live from The FWA, Awwwards. The strip disappears when nothing matches rather than showing an empty shelf.