“We created a vibrant, animated website for an agricultural minerals brand to communicate soil health solutions, mineral products, and sustainable agriculture.”
You can introduce complex science — as long as the story stays grounded in reality and the visuals and animations help translate it.The team, in their Awwwards case study
The verdict
How the Jury Scored It
Every entry is marked out of 10 on four criteria, weighted as shown. Farm Minerals took 7.42 overall, strongest on design and weakest on usability. How the scoring works.
- Design40% of the score 7.56
- Usability30% of the score 7.14
- Creativity20% of the score 7.50
- Content10% of the score 7.54
The build
The Engineering Marks
Alongside the jury, the work underneath is marked separately, and scored 7.09. Accessibility is the lowest of these on three winners in five, and it is the mark that separates careful work from merely impressive work.
- Semantics / SEO 7.20
- Animations / Transitions 7.40
- Accessibility 6.80
- WPO 7.00
- Responsive Design 7.20
- Markup / Meta-data 6.80
Colour
The Palette
Sampled from the site by Awwwards. 2 colours.
#465626#F4EDE6
Ranked either side of this one